Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Blogs > kuuga1972 > 讓人震驚的心痛


kuuga1972 51M
0 posts
3/23/2024 10:17 pm
Important Letter

Dear Sir/Madam,

On September 28, 202- at 1:00 PM, when the hospital issued a medical report for a patient suffering from a second acute stroke, it explicitly stated that the patient was already in an altered state of consciousness upon admission. However, the issue arises when on September 21, 2023, at 4:11 PM, the patient, despite being in an altered state and suffering from a stroke, managed to make a phone call for help. Evidence of this exists in the patient's phone records. Now, assuming the claim of altered consciousness is true, why did the hospital call the patient's family at 11:00 PM on September 21, 2023, and the family clearly stated that the patient had already experienced a first stroke around April 26, 2014, and had a medical history including diabetes? Shouldn't the hospital have taken the first stroke into account?

When the patient's family called the hospital around 10:12 AM on September 22, 2023, looking for the patient, the patient was extremely agitated, claiming, "I am dying, I am dying." At this point, the family noticed the patient's speech was slurred, yet the hospital showed no concern. It wasn't until September 23, 2023, that the hospital confirmed the occurrence of a second acute stroke. They then demanded the patient's family to attend a family meeting at 1:30 PM on September 26, 202-, where they only mentioned that the patient tested positive for MRSA and Candida on the skin, couldn't see, speak, or eat, and couldn't drink water. Consequently, they pressured the family into making an immediate decision to euthanize the patient. However, during this family meeting, the six neurologists never presented any X-rays, brain scans, or other documents (strictly speaking, the time slots should be from 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM for the first, 8:00 PM to 11:00 PM for the second, and 11:00 PM to 2:00 AM for the third on September 21, 2023) for the patient's family to review. What medications were used during this process? It was stated that the patient wouldn't survive past October 1, 2023. Based on all these factors, is it justified for the patient's family to take legal action against the hospital, accusing the six neurologists of misconduct and claiming compensation for all losses incurred?

Sincerely,